What is one key important idea behind this series?
There are three connecting ideas that underpin this series.
But the most important idea behind this series is that we are all interconnected and that by recognising our similarities, we become more open to our differences: ‘Far more unites us than divides us’.
In the process of finding out who they are and how they are the same and different to others, young children are also absorbing the feelings and attitudes of those around them about how a child with their particular social identity is expected to be and what other people think about who they are. This can include stereotyped expectations and also biased responses and behaviours. In this way, children learn that some social identities are valued more or less and so how they feel about their own social identity is hugely impacted by whether the people closest to them perceive them as capable and valued beings or not.
For the child who experiences, prejudice and discrimination, opportunities for fulfilment and expression are closed off and their self-confidence may be impaired, which can have negative consequences for their well-being and achievements in life later on. But also, if children who belong to socially privileged groups learn that the group of people they belong to is deemed ‘superior’, their accurate understanding of themselves can be distorted.
Anti-bias practice is good practice! If we value the well-being of all children, we need to actively develop and engage with everyday practices that address diversity and promote equity for children and their families in every aspect of provision.
Writers who I think are really useful in anti-bias practice, are Glenda McNaughton and Patrick Hughes (2011) who discuss ‘unfair thinking habits’, which help us to consider our own attitudes to diversity and, in terms of pedagogy, Louise Derman-Sparks’ work in the U.S. is really useful.
Challenging stereotypes happens at organisational and personal levels. An example of a direct personal challenge from my latest book is to gently correct a child who makes an unkind or inaccurate remark. For example, an English two-year-old may say ‘Your name is funny’ To Yong, a Korean boy and the practitioner might respond, ‘Yong is a nice Korean name. Does it sound funny because you have never heard it before? Just tell Yong: “I don’t know that name”. Now you know a new name! Let’s tell Yong your name.’
I hope educators will take back a greater personal awareness and reflexivity on this topic and I will also be suggesting some practical tasks to support them in reviewing and reflecting on their practice and provision.
We look forward to seeing you at this special event!